From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hool

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1974
46 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

December 23, 1974


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 22, 1974, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the third degree (three counts) (Penal Law, former § 220.30) and criminally possessing a dangerous drug in the fourth degree (three counts) (Penal Law, former § 220.05), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The findings of fact have not been considered. It was error for the trial court to refuse the request of defendant for instructions to the jury on whether he was in fact acting on behalf of the buyers, the undercover police officers, and that, if he was, the jury must acquit him of all charges. The issues of agency was presented by the evidence and defendant was entitled to the requested charge ( People v. Miller, 24 A.D.2d 1023; People v. Ivory, 27 A.D.2d 844). Shapiro, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hool

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1974
46 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Hool

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID HOOL, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1974

Citations

46 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Salomon v. LaVallee

Under New York law, only a seller and those acting for him may be convicted of a narcotics sales charge. See,…

People v. Turner

However, police officers who were members of the undercover officer's backup team, testified that they saw…