From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ivory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 1967
27 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

March 13, 1967


Judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered January 25, 1966, convicting defendant of the sale of narcotics (Penal Law, § 1751, subd. 1) and of possession of narcotics (Penal Law, § 1751-a, subd. 1), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The findings of fact below have not been considered. In our opinion, it was error for the Trial Judge to refuse the request of defendant for instructions to the jury that "if they believe that the defendant was in fact acting on behalf of the buyer, Paduano, acting on his behalf, then they must acquit him of all charges." The issue of agency of the defendant was presented to the jury under the evidence in the case and defendant was entitled to the charge ( People v. Lindsey, 16 A.D.2d 805, affd. 12 N.Y.2d 958; People v. Miller, 24 A.D.2d 1023). Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ivory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 1967
27 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

People v. Ivory

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES DOUGLAS IVORY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

People v. Volante

Counsel for defendant is correct when he claims that in New York a person cannot be convicted for the offense…

People v. Lothin

The findings of fact have not been considered. One who acts solely as the agent of the buyer in a drug sale…