Opinion
January 11, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Mazur, J.).
Police, on anti-narcotics patrol, observed defendant from a rooftop as defendant engaged in multiple hand-to-hand exchanges. After one exchange, defendant walked to a nearby firebox, pulled out a brown bag, extracted something from the bag, and returned the bag to the firebox. Moments later, police responded, a patdown of defendant recovered a roll of cash, and the bag in the firebox was found to contain 82 vials of crack. Under the standards set forth in People v. Bleakley ( 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495), defendant's guilt was proved beyond a reasonable doubt by overwhelming evidence, and the verdict was not against the weight of that evidence. Defendant's evidentiary challenges, in part, are unpreserved; they are all meritless. Testimony that defendant had engaged in hand-to-hand exchanges, and references to the area as a drug prone location, provided narrative information explaining why police targeted defendant for observation (People v. Rivera, 186 A.D.2d 504, 505). Since defendant never requested a limiting instruction at trial, that claim also is unpreserved (People v. Diaz, 170 A.D.2d 395, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 954). By failing to challenge the competence of trial counsel pursuant to CPL 440.10, defendant failed to provide this Court with a reviewable record. On the basis of the present record, we do not find that defendant was denied meaningful representation (see, People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 709; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147). We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.