From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Adinolfi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1998
250 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 11, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon leaving the scene of a burglary, the defendant disregarded the flashing lights of a responding patrol car and led the police on a high-speed car chase during which he drove his van without headlights, through traffic signals, and against the flow of traffic on a major highway, until it collided with a patrol car, killing the officer inside. The predicate offense for the defendant's felony murder conviction (Penal Law § 125.25 ) was burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). Prior to pleading guilty, the defendant sought dismissal of the felony murder count on the ground that the felony murder statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad since it does not state the specific degrees of burglary which may form the predicate felony.

The County Court properly denied the motion. By enumerating the degrees of some crimes and not others, the Legislature made clear that all degrees of burglary may serve as predicate offenses. This interpretation is in accord with the basic principles of statutory construction and is the only logical reading of the felony murder statute. Moreover, the manner in which the defendant attempted to evade the police in his "immediate flight" (Penal Law § 125.25) from this burglary makes it the very type of dangerous felony which the Legislature intended to serve as a predicate felony ( see, People ex rel. Culhane v. Sullivan, 139 A.D.2d 315). Indeed, at his plea allocution, the defendant admitted that his conduct created a grave risk of death to other people ( see also, People v. Matos, 83 N.Y.2d 509).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Adinolfi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1998
250 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Adinolfi

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARTHUR ADINOLFI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 432

Citing Cases

Curet v. Graham

Third, there is simply no merit to Petitioner's argument that the prosecution's burden of proof was lowered…