From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearlstein v. Baff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1946
270 App. Div. 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

June 24, 1946.


Defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment impressing a trust on certain real property and granting other incidental relief. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The finding that the property in question was an asset of the partnership has no support in the evidence. Appeal from decision dismissed. Appeal by defendants Garvin and Claridge Food Products Corp. from an order denying their motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence dismissed, without costs. In view of the determination of the appeal from the interlocutory judgment, the appeal from the order is academic. Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pearlstein v. Baff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1946
270 App. Div. 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Pearlstein v. Baff

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL PEARLSTEIN, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE W. BAFF et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Eckerman v. Goldberg

The proof adduced at the trial establishes that the parties, at the time the acts complained of were…