From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eckerman v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1953
281 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

March 23, 1953.


Action to recover damages for an alleged fraudulent and deceitful breach of a contract of joint venture. The jury rendered a verdict of $15,000 in favor of plaintiff. The judgment entered on such verdict provides for payment of $993.75 costs, which includes an additional allowance of $750 under section 1513 of the Civil Practice Act. Defendants appeal from the judgment. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The proof adduced at the trial establishes that the parties, at the time the acts complained of were performed, were stockholders of a corporation and not joint venturers. ( Boag v. Thompson, 208 App. Div. 132; Pearlstein v. Baff, 270 App. Div. 1043, amd. 271 App. Div. 834, and affd. 296 N.Y. 881) Adel, Acting P.J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eckerman v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1953
281 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Eckerman v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS ECKERMAN, Respondent, v. LOUIS GOLDBERG et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1953

Citations

281 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Manacher v. Central Coal Co.

He cannot be a stockholder and seek relief as a copartner or as a joint venturer, for surely he is either one…