From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkle v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 30, 2012
44 A.3d 184 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-30

Jennie FINKLE, Administratrix (Estate of Barbara A. Eckert) v. John F. CARROLL III et al.

Steven D. Ecker, Hartford, and M. Caitlin S. Anderson, in support of the petition. Scott M. Karsten, in opposition.


Steven D. Ecker, Hartford, and M. Caitlin S. Anderson, in support of the petition. Scott M. Karsten, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 278, 37 A.3d 851, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the plaintiff's action was not saved by General Statutes § 52–593?”


Summaries of

Finkle v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 30, 2012
44 A.3d 184 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

Finkle v. Carroll

Case Details

Full title:Jennie FINKLE, Administratrix (Estate of Barbara A. Eckert) v. John F…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

44 A.3d 184 (Conn. 2012)
305 Conn. 907

Citing Cases

Finkle v. Carroll

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the…

Finkle v. Carroll

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the…