From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North Fork Bank v. Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 10, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the appeal by the defendants Advanced Purification Systems, Inc., and American Purification and Sterilization, Inc., is dismissed for failure to timely perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court ( see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff payable by the defendant Joseph Petito.

Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the subject deed, mortgage, industrial revenue bond, and the other relevant documents, were permissibly executed as part of a single, integrated transaction which financed an authorized industrial development project ( see, e.g., Matter of Erie County Indus. Dev. Agency v. Roberts, 94 A.D.2d 532). As a result of that transaction, the Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency obtained legal title to the real property in question and, therefore, possessed authority to execute a mortgage in favor of North Fork Bank ( see, General Municipal Law § 858; see also, Lincoln First Bank v. Spaulding Bakeries, 117 Misc.2d 892).

The appellant's claim that the foregoing mortgage was usurious is without merit ( see, Halsey v. Winant, 258 N.Y. 512; Gross v. Lichtman, 55 A.D.2d 670; Broad Wall Corp. v. O'Connor, 13 A.D.2d 462; Kahn v. Sohmer, 12 A.D.2d 982).

The appellant's remaining contentions are similarly without merit ( see, Board of Educ. v. Town of Wallkill Indus. Dev. Agency, 222 A.D.2d 475; Matter of Glens Falls City School Dist. v. City of Glens Falls Indus. Dev. Agency, 196 A.D.2d 334).

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

North Fork Bank v. Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

North Fork Bank v. Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency

Case Details

Full title:NORTH FORK BANK, Respondent, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 128

Citing Cases

In re Elder v. Nassau Cty. Indus. Dev. Agency

The undersigned concludes it was not ( Hart v. Holtzman, 215 AD2d 175; Erie County Industrial Development…