From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency (In re Pesticide Action Network N. Am.)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec 10, 2015
808 F.3d 402 (9th Cir. 2015)

Summary

summarizing the standard for determining the proper remedy

Summary of this case from Janet M. v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.

Opinion

No. 14–72794.

12-10-2015

In re PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA; Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Pesticide Action Network North America; Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Petitioners, v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

Patti A. Goldman (argued), Matthew Baca, and Kristen Boyles, Earthjustice, Seattle, Washington, for Petitioners. Sam Hirsch, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Erica Zilioli (argued), United States Department of Justice, Environmental Enforcement Section, Washington, D.C.; Mark Dyner, Office of General Counsel, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.


Patti A. Goldman (argued), Matthew Baca, and Kristen Boyles, Earthjustice, Seattle, Washington, for Petitioners.

Sam Hirsch, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Erica Zilioli (argued), United States Department of Justice, Environmental Enforcement Section, Washington, D.C.; Mark Dyner, Office of General Counsel, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

ORDER

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is directed to take final action by December 30, 2016 on its proposed revocation rule and its final response to Pesticide Action Network North America and Natural Resources Defense Council's (collectively “PANNA”) 2007 petition.

EPA shall file an interim status report with the Court no later than June 30, 2016. In that report, EPA shall advise the Court of its efforts to comply with the deadline. EPA shall also include a detailed explanation of extraordinary circumstances, if any exist, that make EPA's compliance with the final action deadline of December 30, 2016 impracticable to meet. If EPA's interim status report includes such an “extraordinary circumstances” recitation, PANNA shall have 30 days to file a response thereto.

The panel shall retain jurisdiction over any further proceedings related to this petition.


Summaries of

Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency (In re Pesticide Action Network N. Am.)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec 10, 2015
808 F.3d 402 (9th Cir. 2015)

summarizing the standard for determining the proper remedy

Summary of this case from Janet M. v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.

summarizing the standard for determining the proper remedy

Summary of this case from Janet M. v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.
Case details for

Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency (In re Pesticide Action Network N. Am.)

Case Details

Full title:In re PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA; Natural Resources Defense…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Dec 10, 2015

Citations

808 F.3d 402 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Regan

In other words, this Court, despite the EPA's repeated disregard of this Court's orders, most leniently gave…

League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wheeler

Accordingly, in December 2015, we ordered the EPA "to take final action by December 30, 2016 on its proposed…