From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Napier v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Oct 12, 1976
338 So. 2d 463 (Ala. Crim. App. 1976)

Opinion

1 Div. 693.

October 12, 1976.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Joseph M. Hocklander, Judge.

David L. Barnett, Mobile, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and James S. Ward, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.


This is an appeal from a conviction of possession of a variety of controlled substances. The general issue on Count 1 (quaalude), Count 3 (morphine sulfate), Count 4 (pantapon), and Count 5 (methamphetamine) resulted in a general verdict of guilty with a fine of $25,000. The trial judge sentenced Napier to five years penitentiary punishment.

The only two adverse rulings worthy of comment are correct under Brantley, 294 Ala. 344, 317 So.2d 345 (multiplicity of drugs in evidence) and Cassell, 55 Ala. App. 502, 317 So.2d 348 (non legislative ascribing methaquaalude to controlled substance list ex post facto by the non-elected State Board of Health).

Hence, the judgment below is

AFFIRMED.

TYSON, HARRIS, DeCARLO and BOOKOUT, JJ., concur.

CATES, P.J., dissents.


I think Brantley, supra, is wrong, but our elder brethren have spoken.

However, Cassell, supra, was never squarely laid before them. I repeat my dissent therein.

Therefore, I respectfully dissent.


Summaries of

Napier v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Oct 12, 1976
338 So. 2d 463 (Ala. Crim. App. 1976)
Case details for

Napier v. State

Case Details

Full title:Damon Shelton NAPIER v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Oct 12, 1976

Citations

338 So. 2d 463 (Ala. Crim. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Reed v. State

We do not agree. The Court of Criminal Appeals has applied Brantley subsequent to the decision in DeGruy v.…

Williford v. State

I In his motion for new trial the appellant raised the issue of the constitutionality of Section 20-2-20,…