From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moseley v. Horton

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 20, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:06cv539-MHT (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:06cv539-MHT.

November 20, 2006


ORDER


On October 31, 2006 (doc. no. 16), the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED that the Recommendation be and is hereby adopted and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action and his failure to comply with the orders of the court.


Summaries of

Moseley v. Horton

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Nov 20, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:06cv539-MHT (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Moseley v. Horton

Case Details

Full title:RONALD AUSTIN MOSELEY, #132340, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR HORTON, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Nov 20, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:06cv539-MHT (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2006)

Citing Cases

Pate v. Bruner

Howell P. Rogers, of Greenville, and Jos. R. Bell, of Hayneville, for appellant. There is no equity in the…

Ex Parte Pollard

Steele v. Booker, 205 Ala. 210, 87 So. 203; Atlanta, B. A. R. Co. v. McGill, 194 Ala. 186, 69 So. 874;…