From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moray v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 3, 2009
345 F. App'x 144 (6th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-5132.

September 3, 2009.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.

Before: MARTIN, COLE, and KETHLEDGE; Circuit Judges.


Roxanne Moray worked for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation as a sales representative. After Novartis terminated her employment, she sued the company alleging retaliation under Tennessee law, negligent or intentional misrepresentation, and outrageous conduct. The district court granted Novartis's motion for summary judgment, finding that Moray did not point to evidence sufficient to permit a jury to find in her favor on any of her claims.

After reviewing the record and briefs, we AFFIRM the district court's disposition of the case and adopt its thorough and well-reasoned opinion as our own. See Moray v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., 2009 WL 82471 (M.D.Tenn. Jan.9, 2009).


Summaries of

Moray v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 3, 2009
345 F. App'x 144 (6th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Moray v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Roxanne MORAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Sep 3, 2009

Citations

345 F. App'x 144 (6th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Vancleave v. Reelfoot Bank

1986)) (emphasis added by Guy Court). Subsequent cases have cited these statements in Guy and Collins, but…