From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. United States ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Co.

U.S.
Mar 7, 1910
216 U.S. 608 (1910)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 115.

Argued March 1, 2, 1910. Decided March 7, 1910.

A writ of error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia dismissed for want of jurisdiction without opinion on the authority of Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1, and other cases cited. Writ of error to review 33 App.D.C. 597, dismissed.

Mr. Frederick P. Fish and Mr. Melville Church, with whom Mr. Albert G. Davis was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Robert N. Kenyon, with whom Mr. Walter F. Rogers and Mr. Charles H. Duell were on the brief, for defendant in error.


The writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1; Rousseau v. Browne, 21 App.D.C. 73, 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U.S. 284; Atkins v. Moore, 212 U.S. 285; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U.S. 561; Same v. Same, 27 App.D.C. 530, 532; Taylor v. Taft, 203 U.S. 461; United States v. Lynch, 137 U.S. 280; Baltimore Potomac R.R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U.S. 210, 226. The application for certiorari is also denied.


Summaries of

Moore v. United States ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Co.

U.S.
Mar 7, 1910
216 U.S. 608 (1910)
Case details for

Moore v. United States ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Co.

Case Details

Full title:MOORE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, v . UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWCOMB MOTOR…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 7, 1910

Citations

216 U.S. 608 (1910)

Citing Cases

Universal Shelters of America, Inc. v. U.S.

When the lack of good faith that is alleged does not sink to the level of fraud or quasi-criminal wrongdoing,…

Rodriguez v. U.S.

And when the government actions that are alleged are not formal, discretionary decisions, but instead the…