From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaines v. Knecht

U.S.
Dec 14, 1908
212 U.S. 561 (1908)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 52.

Argued December 11, 1908. Decided December 14, 1908.

Writ of error to review decision of Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia on appeal from Commissioner of Patents, 27 App.D.C. 530, dismissed on authority of Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1.

Mr. James L. Hopkins, Mr. Daniel W. Lindsey and Mr. Alfred A. Eicks for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Arthur E. Wallace for defendant in error.


Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1. See act of February 20, 1905, for the registration of trade-marks, c. 592, 33 Stat. 724, §§ 9, 16, 17, 18, et passim.

[The headnote in Frasch v. Moore also appears as a note to Atkins v. Moore, ante, p. 285; and see ante, p. 290, for reference to point decided in Gaines v. Knecht.]


Summaries of

Gaines v. Knecht

U.S.
Dec 14, 1908
212 U.S. 561 (1908)
Case details for

Gaines v. Knecht

Case Details

Full title:GAINES v . KNECHT

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 14, 1908

Citations

212 U.S. 561 (1908)

Citing Cases

Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.

Section 9 of the Trade-Mark Act of 1905, applies to the appeal taken under it the same rules which under §…

Moore v. United States ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Co.

The writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1; Rousseau v. Browne, 21…