From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metropolitan Dade Cty v. Walsh Constr

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 19, 1990
570 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2419.

November 13, 1990. Rehearing Denied December 19, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Robert P. Kaye, J.

George, Hartz Lundeen and Esther E. Galicia and Stanley V. Buky, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Siegfried, Kipnis, Rivera, Lerner, De La Torre Mocarski and H. Hugh McConnell and Steven Siegfried, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.


Dade County appeals an adverse jury verdict in an action for breach of a construction contract contending that its motion for a directed verdict should have been granted, or in the alternative, that a new trial should be granted because the jury instructions were confusing and erroneous. We affirm for the following reasons.

First, review of the allegedly erroneous and confusing jury instruction was not preserved by a contemporaneous and specific objection. City of Orlando v. Birmingham, 539 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 1989); Rule 1.470(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. Where, during the actual charge, the trial court varies from the wording of the written instructions, objections must be raised in a timely fashion to enable the trial court to cure any error. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1978); Fleitas v. Robinson, 273 So.2d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). In this case Dade County made no objection during or immediately after the jury was charged. An objection after the jury had returned its verdict was untimely.

Second, the evidence was legally sufficient to survive a motion for a directed verdict in favor of Dade County. Tiny's Liquors, Inc. v. Davis, 353 So.2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The evidence supports the jury finding that Dade County breached the agreement in rejecting the subcontractor's offer to resubmit shop drawings showing that the Westinghouse switch gear could be fitted into the space provided for by the bid specifications and would conform to those specifications. There is evidence in the record which supports the jury's finding that the cost overrun resulting from the change from a Westinghouse unit to a General Electric unit was caused by Dade County's bad faith.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Metropolitan Dade Cty v. Walsh Constr

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 19, 1990
570 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Metropolitan Dade Cty v. Walsh Constr

Case Details

Full title:METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. WALSH CONSTRUCTION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 19, 1990

Citations

570 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)