From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleitas v. Robinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 21, 1973
273 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 72-757.

February 21, 1973.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Harvie S. Duval, J.

Grover, Weinstein Stauber and Arnold Lasky, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Talburt, Kubicki, Vogler Carhart, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.


Plaintiff-appellant appeals from a final judgment of the lower court entered upon a jury verdict awarding him $2,000 in damages.

As a result of an automobile accident, plaintiff sustained various injuries, including a permanent scarring of the lip. At the close of the trial, the judge informed the attorneys that the Florida Standard Jury Instructions would be read to the jury. No special instructions were requested by either counsel. In giving Florida Standard Jury Instruction 6.2(a), 31 F.S.A., to the jury, the court omitted the word "disfigurement" contained therein. The jury returned a $2,000 verdict for plaintiff. Thereafter, plaintiff's attorney moved for a new trial as to the issue of damages. The motion was denied.

A search of the record below reveals that plaintiff's attorney made no request for specific jury charges. In addition, he made no objection to instruction 6.2(a) as it was presented to the jury. Failure to timely object to a jury instruction precludes a party from assigning as error the giving of such instruction. See RCP 1.470(b), 30 F.S.A.

Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court must be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fleitas v. Robinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 21, 1973
273 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

Fleitas v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO FLEITAS, APPELLANT, v. RICHMOND ROBINSON AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 21, 1973

Citations

273 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Monroig

The decree as entered was unwarranted, because the easement prayed for by the bill and provided for by the…

Metropolitan Dade Cty v. Walsh Constr

We affirm for the following reasons. First, review of the allegedly erroneous and confusing jury instruction…