From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meisel v. North Jersey Trust Company of Ridgewood

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 10, 1963
216 F. Supp. 469 (S.D.N.Y. 1963)

Summary

granting motion to strike punitive damages from complaint because such damages not available under relevant provisions of Securities Exchange Act

Summary of this case from In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether

Opinion

April 10, 1963.

Mermelstein, Burns, Lesser Goldman, New York City, for plaintiff. By Stanley Goldman, New York City.

Brown, Wood, Fuller, Caldwell Ivey, New York City, for defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith Incorporated. By Earl J. McHugh, New York City.


This motion is by defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Incorporated, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), to strike certain parts of the amended complaint as "immaterial".

The action is against several defendants, the complaint alleging as against the movant a violation of two sections of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, namely, Sections 7(c) and 10(b), 15 U.S.C. § 78g(c) and 78j(b). Federal jurisdiction is based on Section 27 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa.

The narrow point raised by the motion is whether punitive damages may be recovered by a plaintiff in an action based on a violation of the Act. It seems clear that the answer is negative, since the Act expressly provides in Section 28, 15 U.S.C. § 78bb, that a plaintiff may never recover more than his "actual damages". The fact that the statutory remedies are additional to any other remedies is of no significance; plaintiff is in any event limited to his "actual damages". In considering the assignability of rights of action under the Act, they have been held to be "remedial" and not "penal". Mills v. Sarjem Corp., 133 F. Supp. 753, 761, see also 770 (D.N.J. 1955); International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Shields Co., 209 F. Supp. 145, 149 (S.D.N.Y. 1962).

Motion granted. Technically the matter to be struck is more properly classified as "impertinent", which term includes matters irrelevant to the issues and which are not properly in issue between the parties (2 Moore's Federal Practice, pp. 2312-13); in any event, this should not prevent granting the relief sought.

In paragraph "33" of the amended complaint, the words "punitive damages in the amount of $30,000.00, together with" are ordered stricken.

In paragraph "(g)" of the prayer for relief, the letter "s" in the word "defendants" and the words "Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Incorporated and" and "respectively" are ordered stricken.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Meisel v. North Jersey Trust Company of Ridgewood

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 10, 1963
216 F. Supp. 469 (S.D.N.Y. 1963)

granting motion to strike punitive damages from complaint because such damages not available under relevant provisions of Securities Exchange Act

Summary of this case from In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether
Case details for

Meisel v. North Jersey Trust Company of Ridgewood

Case Details

Full title:Theodore MEISEL, Plaintiff, v. The NORTH JERSEY TRUST COMPANY OF…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 10, 1963

Citations

216 F. Supp. 469 (S.D.N.Y. 1963)

Citing Cases

Klein v. Spear, Leeds Kellogg

Section 28(a) of the S.E.A., 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(a). See Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291, 302-303 (2d…

Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood

Although common law remedies are expressly preserved, the conclusion is unavoidable that common law damage…