From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMenemy v. McMenemy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 2001
289 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-09173

Argued October 16, 2001.

December 17, 2001.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), entered August 31, 2000, as, upon a decision of the same court dated June 7, 2000, granted that branch of the defendant wife's motion which was for leave to amend her answer to include a counterclaim for reformation and rescission of the parties' separation agreement, and, in effect, denied that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was to incorporate the terms of the separation agreement into the judgment of divorce, and directed the defendant to serve the counterclaim on the plaintiff.

Michael D. Solomon, Levittown, N.Y. (Peter M. Zirbes of counsel), for appellant.

Arthur M. Kahn, Woodstock, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the order and judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the defendant's motion is denied, that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was to incorporate the parties' separation agreement into the divorce judgment is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment which incorporates the terms of the parties' separation agreement.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant leave to amend her answer on the date of trial to include a counterclaim to rescind a separation agreement entered into between the parties five years earlier, since she did not establish that the agreement was unconscionable or the result of fraud (see, Collison-Harrington v. Harrington, 279 A.D.2d 444; Anthony v. Anthony, 199 A.D.2d 353; Torsiello v. Torsiello, 188 A.D.2d 523, 524; Capone v. Capone, 148 A.D.2d 565; Patti v. Patti, 146 A.D.2d 757).

O'BRIEN, J.P., McGINITY, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McMenemy v. McMenemy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 2001
289 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

McMenemy v. McMenemy

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM McMENEMY, appellant, v. DEBORAH McMENEMY, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 880