From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGuffin v. Dannels

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Sep 28, 2021
6:20-cv-01163-MK (D. Or. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

6:20-cv-01163-MK

09-28-2021

NICHOLAS JAMES MCGUFFIN and S.M., Plaintiffs, v. MARK DANNELS; PAT DOWNING; SUSAN HORMANN; MARY KRINGS; KRIS KARCHER; SHELLY MCINNES; RAYMOND MCNEELY; KIP OSWALD; MICHAEL REAVES; JOHN RIDDLE; SEAN SANBORN; ERIC SCHWENNIGER; RICHARD WALTER; CHRIS WEBLEY; ANTHONY WETMORE; KATHY WILCOX; CRAIG ZANNI; DAVID ZALAVA; ESTATE OF DAVE HALL; VIDOCQ SOCIETY; CITY OF COQUILLE; CITY OF COOS BAY; COOS COUNTY; and OREGON STATE POLICE, Defendants.


ORDER

Michael McShane, United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 83), and the matter is now before this court on Plaintiffs and Defendants objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 83) is adopted in full. City and County Defendants' (Defendants Dannels, Downing, Karcher, McInnes, Mcneely, Oswald, reeves, Sanborn, Schwenninger, Webley, Wetmore, Zanni, Zavala, City of Coquille, City of Coos Bay, and Coos County) Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 49, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation. State Defendants' (Defendants Riddle, Hormann, Krings, Wilcox, and Oregon State Police) Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 57, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation. Vidocq Defendants' (Defendants Walter and Vidocq Society) Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 55, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation.

Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike, ECF No. 62, is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs' Motion to Substitute a Party, ECF No. 72, is GRANTED. The Estate of David E. Hall's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 77, is DENIED as moot.

Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McGuffin v. Dannels

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Sep 28, 2021
6:20-cv-01163-MK (D. Or. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

McGuffin v. Dannels

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS JAMES MCGUFFIN and S.M., Plaintiffs, v. MARK DANNELS; PAT…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

6:20-cv-01163-MK (D. Or. Sep. 28, 2021)

Citing Cases

Bliss v. Adewusi

In a case similar to this case, involving both government and private defendants, another court in this…

Bliss v. Adewusi

In a case similar to this case, involving both government and private defendants, another court in this…