From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. Provident Indemnity Life

U.S.
Mar 18, 1996
516 U.S. 1174 (1996)

Summary

finding ERISA welfare benefit plan where insurer paid health insurance premiums and reasonable person could determine benefits, class of beneficiaries, and procedures for receiving benefits

Summary of this case from Vulcan v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 95-1166.

March 18, 1996, October TERM, 1995.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 60 F. 3d 234.


Summaries of

McDonald v. Provident Indemnity Life

U.S.
Mar 18, 1996
516 U.S. 1174 (1996)

finding ERISA welfare benefit plan where insurer paid health insurance premiums and reasonable person could determine benefits, class of beneficiaries, and procedures for receiving benefits

Summary of this case from Vulcan v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.

stating that an infringer's liability for unfair competition and trademark infringement hinges on likelihood of confusion

Summary of this case from Curcio Webb v. National Benefit Programs Agency

explaining that "[t]o establish a claimed breach of fiduciary duty, an ERISA plaintiff must prove a breach of a fiduciary duty and a prima facie case of loss to the plan" and that "[o]nce the plaintiff has satisfied these burdens, the burden of persuasion shifts to the fiduciary to prove that the loss was not caused by ... the breach of duty"

Summary of this case from Gold v. Coenen (In re Trans-Indus., Inc.)
Case details for

McDonald v. Provident Indemnity Life

Case Details

Full title:McDONALD ET UX., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS AND GUARDIANS OF…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 18, 1996

Citations

516 U.S. 1174 (1996)

Citing Cases

In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative "ERISA"

Switzer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 52 F.3d 1294, 1299 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding that plan administrator has no…

Burnside v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield

A plaintiff may seek relief under § 1132(a)(2), however, only when the recovery "inures to the benefit of the…