From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Brimmer

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Mar 20, 2003
No. 02-02-254-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2003)

Opinion

No. 02-02-254-CV.

Delivered: March 20, 2003.

Appeal from the 78th District Court of Wichita County.

PANEL F: DAY, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


Appellant pro se Vernie Wayne McDaniel filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's summary judgment on July 17, 2002. McDaniel has not, however, filed a brief in this case. Appellee Robert A. Brimmer, M.D. has filed a brief in support of the trial court's judgment. We affirm.

Although McDaniel is proceeding pro se, he is required to comply with the rules of appellate procedure in pursuing his appeal. See Shull v. United Parcel Serv., 4 S.W.3d 46, 52-53 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 835 (2000). Where a party fails to file a brief, rule 38.8 allows the appellate court to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution or, if an appellee's brief is filed, the court may regard that brief as correctly presenting the case and may affirm the trial court's judgment upon that brief without examining the record. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1), (3); Harkins v. Dever Nursing Home, 999 S.W.2d 571, 573 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.). Because Dr. Brimmer filed his brief in this case, we choose the latter option.

We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Brimmer

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Mar 20, 2003
No. 02-02-254-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2003)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Brimmer

Case Details

Full title:VERNIE WAYNE McDANIEL, Appellant v. ROBERT A. BRIMMER, M.D., Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Mar 20, 2003

Citations

No. 02-02-254-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2003)

Citing Cases

Cooper v. McFadin

We further granted her request for an extension of time to file an amended brief. Cooper's amended brief,…