From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 835 (2000)

Summary

relying on federal analysis of eighth amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment in holding that lethal injection does not violate state constitution

Summary of this case from State v. Clark

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


99-9508 LOFTON v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-9511 WALSH v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 1327.

99-9513 SHAW v. HILL, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 832.

99-9518 TRICE v. GIBSON, WARDEN. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 196 F.3d 1151.

99-9519 WEBB v. CONNECTICUT. Sup.Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 252 Conn. 128, 750 A.2d 448.

99-9520 LONG v. LOUISIANA. Ct. App. La., 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 744 So.2d 143.

99-9521 LAWHORN v. ALABAMA. Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 756 So.2d 971.

99-9523 MEYER v. MONSANTO EMPLOYEES BENEFIT PLAN. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.

99-9526 BATES v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 750 So.2d 6.

99-9528 MEADOR v. ESTATE OF McFADDEN ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 172 F.3d 869.

99-9531 SHULL v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE. Ct. App. Tex., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 S.W.3d 46.

99-9532 PRICE v. CAIN, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-9534 SLAUGHTER v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-9535 SATCHELL v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 835 (2000)

relying on federal analysis of eighth amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment in holding that lethal injection does not violate state constitution

Summary of this case from State v. Clark

noting that pro se litigants must comply with applicable laws and rules of procedure

Summary of this case from In Interest of J.S.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 835 (2000)

Citing Cases

State v. Santiago

During that time, a number of members of this court voiced their concern that our state's capital punishment…

State v. Santiago

procedural challenges to General Statutes [Rev. to 1983] § 53a–46a because “statute enables a jury, with…