From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Summary

In Hospers v. Hungerford-Smith Co. (194 App. Div. 945) claimant's intestate resided in Sheldon, Iowa. The defendant, Hungerford-Smith Company, was a New York State corporation, and had its principal place of business at Rochester, N.Y. The deceased hired out in Rochester to work in Missouri, where he was killed.

Summary of this case from Minto v. Hitchings Co.

Opinion

November, 1920.


Award affirmed on the authority of Matter of Klein v. Stoller Cook Co. ( 220 N.Y. 670); Matter of Fitzpatrick v. Blackall Baldwin Co. (Id. 671), and Jenkins v. Hogan Sons, Inc. ( 177 App. Div. 36), it having been found that the contract of employment was made in the year 1914. All concur, except John M. Kellogg, P.J., dissenting on the authority of Matter of Smith v. Heine Boiler Co. ( 224 N.Y. 9) and Matter of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co. ( 171 App. Div. 66).


Summaries of

Matter of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

In Hospers v. Hungerford-Smith Co. (194 App. Div. 945) claimant's intestate resided in Sheldon, Iowa. The defendant, Hungerford-Smith Company, was a New York State corporation, and had its principal place of business at Rochester, N.Y. The deceased hired out in Rochester to work in Missouri, where he was killed.

Summary of this case from Minto v. Hitchings Co.

In Hospers v. Hungerford-Smith Co. (194 App. Div. 945; affd., 230 N.Y. 616) the claimant, a traveling salesman, was injured while traveling, in Missouri, in an automobile, which skidded.

Summary of this case from Harby v. Marwell Brothers, Inc.
Case details for

Matter of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Company

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1920

Citations

194 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Citing Cases

Harby v. Marwell Brothers, Inc.

" In Kass v. Hirschberg, Schutz Co. ( 191 App. Div. 300) this court held that a traveling salesman, who was…

Minto v. Hitchings Co.

The respondent, the State Industrial Board, has found that he and his employer were residents of the State of…