From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Klein v. Stoller Cook Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1917
116 N.E. 1055 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued March 1, 1917

Decided March 20, 1917

William H. Hotchkiss for appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, on authority of Matter of Post v. Burger Gohlke ( 216 N.Y. 544).

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Klein v. Stoller Cook Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1917
116 N.E. 1055 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Matter of Klein v. Stoller Cook Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SAMUEL KLEIN, Respondent, against STOLLER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 20, 1917

Citations

116 N.E. 1055 (N.Y. 1917)
116 N.E. 1055

Citing Cases

Stine v. Weiner

N YConsol. Laws, Workmen's Compensation Law § 2. Post v. Burger Gohlke, 216 N.Y. 544, 111 N.E. 351 (1916);…

Prendergast v. Indus. Comm

The plaintiff's husband was a traveling salesman selling accounting machines, being district sales manager…