Opinion
April 27, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.).
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly relied upon the three comparable sales proffered in common by the parties to establish the value of the subject property ( see, e.g., Matter of Caldor, Inc. v. Board of Assessors, 227 A.D.2d 400; see also, Matter of Allied Corp. v. Town of Camillus, 80 N.Y.2d 351, 356; Matter of Merrick Holding Corp. v. Board of Assessors, 45 N.Y.2d 538, 542). The appellants' contention that the court improperly disregarded evidence of actual income in reaching its determination is without merit ( see, Matter of Caldor, Inc. v. Board of Assessors, supra; Matter of Krebs v. Board of Assessors, 225 A.D.2d 625).
We have reviewed the appellants' remaining contentions and find no basis for reversal.
Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.