From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Crossman Cadillac v. Board of Assessors

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 6, 1978
380 N.E.2d 157 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued June 1, 1978

Decided July 6, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ROBERT C. MEADE, J.

Edward G. McCabe, County Attorney (Matthew A. Tedone and William S. Norden of counsel), for appellants.

George B. Costigan, Jr., and Stephen G. Limmer for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with costs. The privately owned telephone system installed in petitioner's business premises is not assessable as real property under section 102 (subd 12, par [d]) of the Real Property Tax Law, aimed principally at expanding the definition of real property with respect to utility companies (see Matter of Crystal v City of Syracuse, 47 A.D.2d 29, 31, affd 38 N.Y.2d 883). The telephone system, which includes 26 telephone instruments, an apparatus cabinet, and 10 trunk relays, is removable without significant injury to the premises and is capable of reinstallation elsewhere. Hence, the movable equipment does not raise the issue reserved in the caveat in Matter of Crystal with reference to systems "incorporated as part of the real estate" (Matter of Crystal v City of Syracuse, 38 N.Y.2d 883, affg 47 A.D.2d 29, supra; see Matter of Metropolitan Bank of Syracuse v Department of Assessment, 44 N.Y.2d 864, affg on mem at 57 A.D.2d 1055). If equipment such as that involved in this case should be assessable as real property the remedy is legislative rather than by strained or distortive judicial decisional analysis.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Crossman Cadillac v. Board of Assessors

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 6, 1978
380 N.E.2d 157 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

Matter of Crossman Cadillac v. Board of Assessors

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CROSSMAN CADILLAC, INC., Respondent, v. BOARD OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 6, 1978

Citations

380 N.E.2d 157 (N.Y. 1978)
380 N.E.2d 157
408 N.Y.S.2d 326

Citing Cases

T-Mobile Ne., LLC v. DeBellis

Then, in 1975, in Matter of Crystal v City of Syracuse, Dept. of Assessment (38 NY2d 883 [1976]), we affirmed…

T-Mobile Ne., LLC v. Debellis

First, the FCC invalidated the requirement that telephone customers use only utility-issued equipment,…