From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Crystal v. City of Syracuse

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1976
346 N.E.2d 546 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1976

Decided February 12, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, RICHARD ARONSON, J.

Edward P. Kearse, Corporation Counsel (Eleanor Theodore of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth D. Whitelaw for respondents. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Joseph P. McCale, Ruth Kessler Toch and Douglas S. Dales, Jr., of counsel), for New York State Board of Equalization and Assessment, amicus curiae.


MEMORANDUM.

We affirm on the opinion of Mr. Justice SIMONS. In so doing, it is noted that the court does not have before it a situation in which the owner of the real estate has incorporated as part of the real estate a telephone or telegraph system.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Crystal v. City of Syracuse

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 12, 1976
346 N.E.2d 546 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Crystal v. City of Syracuse

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MILTON J. CRYSTAL et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 12, 1976

Citations

346 N.E.2d 546 (N.Y. 1976)
346 N.E.2d 546
382 N.Y.S.2d 745

Citing Cases

T-Mobile Ne., LLC v. DeBellis

period, the network of equipment constituting the telephone system was generally taxable under the RPTL.…

Matter of Metro. Bk. v. Dept. of Assessment

ust as they would be taxable if owned by a telephone company (see Matter of New York Tel. Co. [Canough], 290…