From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of A.N.P. Cy. Co. v. Chulack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
265 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 25, 1999

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.),


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing on the issue of whether the respondent is an "insured person", as that term is defined in the subject automobile insurance policy; and it is further,

ORDERED that arbitration is temporarily stayed pending the hearing and new determination.

The Supreme Court erred in failing to hold a hearing on the issue of whether the respondent is an "insured person" as that term is defined in his parents' automobile insurance policy. The petitioner has raised an issue of fact as to whether the respondent qualifies as a "relative", which the policy defines as "a person living with you and related to you by blood, marriage, or adoption". The petitioner contends that the respondent was not living in the same household as his parents at the time of the accident. The petitioner met its burden of establishing the existence of evidentiary facts sufficient to conclude that there is a genuine preliminary issue which requires a hearing and justifies a stay (see, National Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Diaz, 111 A.D.2d 700 ). Evidence that the respondent's driver's license, voter's registration card, and the previous year's income tax returns listed his parents' home address as his own residence address is insufficient to establish that the respondent was "living with" his parents at the time of the accident (see, Matter of Aetna Cas. Surety Co. v. Gutstein, 80 N.Y.2d 773 ; Matter of Aetna Cas. Surety Co. v. Panetta, 202 A.D.2d 662 ; D'Amico v. Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins. Co., 72 A.D.2d 783, affd 52 N.Y.2d 1000 ; cf., Dutkanych v. United States Fid. Guar. Co., 252 A.D.2d 537 ;Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 181 A.D.2d 1022 ).

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of A.N.P. Cy. Co. v. Chulack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
265 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of A.N.P. Cy. Co. v. Chulack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 153

Citing Cases

United States Auto. Ass'n v. Mickens

Respondent averred in an affidavit that he leased his New York City apartment eight months before the…

State Farm Fire Ins. Co. v. Parker

It requires a certain degree of permanency and intention to remain (see, Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto Ins.…