From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Panetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1994
202 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Colby, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant is not a covered person entitled to underinsured motorist benefits under her father's insurance policy. The policy provides such coverage only for a "family member", defined in the policy as "a person related to [the insured] by blood, marriage or adoption who is a resident of [the insured's] household".

Although the appellant stored some belongings in her father's house and would visit there approximately once a month, we conclude that she was not a resident of the household (see, Matter of Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. v. Gutstein, 80 N.Y.2d 773, revg 169 A.D.2d 718). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Panetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1994
202 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Panetta

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Respondent, v. SUSAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 631

Citing Cases

In re State Farm Mut. Automobile Insur. Co.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is…

Government Employees Ins. v. Paolicelli

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court,…