Argued October 2, 1922
Decided October 17, 1922
Samuel Seabury and George Trosk for appellant.
Nathan O. Petty for respondent.
Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( Edward G. Griffin and Robert P. Beyer of counsel), amicus curiæ.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Absent: McLAUGHLIN, J.
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of SANDY J. ADAMS, Appellant, for a…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 17, 1922
In Matter of Metz v Maddox ( 189 N.Y. 460) the Court of Appeals, in striking down a statute authorizing the…
Matter of Criss v. FineganI dissent and vote to reverse the order and to deny the application. Article II, section 6, of the State…