Summary
concluding that any error in precluding certain questioning was harmless, where "[t]here [was] no indication in the record that the District Court granted the [ HRS § 604-10.5 ] Petition based on [respondent's] picture-taking"
Summary of this case from Nakama v. RussellOpinion
NO. CAAP-18-0000702
06-30-2020
Russell R. MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Richard T. KOZUMA, Respondent-Appellant
On the briefs: James V. Myhre, Samantha Storm, and Jason K. Adaniya, (Myhre, Tsuchida, Richards & Storm), for Respondent-Appellant. Russell R. Martin, Pro Se Petitioner-Appellee.
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
Affirmed.