From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martens v. Sjostrom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Apr 7, 2014
Civil No. 13-2297 (JRT/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 7, 2014)

Summary

dismissing with prejudice based on sovereign immunity because “there is no court of competent jurisdiction in which this complaint can be filed”

Summary of this case from Magnate, LLC v. United States Envtl. Prot. Agency

Opinion

Civil No. 13-2297 (JRT/JSM)

04-07-2014

HENRY MARTENS, Plaintiff, v. POSTMASTER DEB SJOSTROM, Defendant.

Henry Martens, 53988 County Road 15, Lafayette, MN 56054, pro se plaintiff. Pamela Marentette, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for defendant.


ORDER ON REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

Henry Martens, 53988 County Road 15, Lafayette, MN 56054, pro se plaintiff.

Pamela Marentette, Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for defendant.

This matter came before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated March 17, 2014. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Defendant's Motion for Substitution and to Dismiss [Docket No. 3] is GRANTED.
(2) This matter is dismissed with prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
DATED: April 7, 2014
at Minneapolis, Minnesota

__________________

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martens v. Sjostrom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Apr 7, 2014
Civil No. 13-2297 (JRT/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 7, 2014)

dismissing with prejudice based on sovereign immunity because “there is no court of competent jurisdiction in which this complaint can be filed”

Summary of this case from Magnate, LLC v. United States Envtl. Prot. Agency

dismissing with prejudice based on sovereign immunity because "there is no court of competent jurisdiction in which this complaint can be filed"

Summary of this case from Niblock v. Davis
Case details for

Martens v. Sjostrom

Case Details

Full title:HENRY MARTENS, Plaintiff, v. POSTMASTER DEB SJOSTROM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Apr 7, 2014

Citations

Civil No. 13-2297 (JRT/JSM) (D. Minn. Apr. 7, 2014)

Citing Cases

Niblock v. Davis

a waiver of sovereign immunity, and because jurisdiction would also be lacking in state court, the court will…

Melton v. Zimmerman

Other courts have dismissed similar claims. Erickson v. U.S. Post Office, No. CIV. 06-186 JRT/RLE, 2006 WL…