From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maria v. Jerome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 2008
52 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3914.

June 12, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered March 28, 2007, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

Peña Kahn, PLLC, Bronx (Steven L. Kahn of counsel), for appellant.

Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis Fishlinger, Uniondale (Kathleen D. Foley of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.


Plaintiff alleges she fell on a soapy sidewalk while exiting her vehicle at defendants' car wash. Defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that they neither created the hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence ( see Britto v Great Ail. Pac. Tea Co., Inc., 21 AD3d 436). Plaintiff was under no obligation to rebut defendants' expert's conclusions with an expert of her own, since expert testimony is not required where the question of whether there is an unsafe condition is within the common knowledge and experience of jurors ( see Chafoulias v 240 E. 55th St. Tenants Corp., 141 AD2d 207, 211). In view of the foregoing, there is no necessity to pass on the merits of defendants' expert testimony.


Summaries of

Maria v. Jerome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 2008
52 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Maria v. Jerome

Case Details

Full title:MARIA INFANTE, Appellant, v. JEROME CAR WASH et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 2008

Citations

52 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 5364
859 N.Y.S.2d 644

Citing Cases

Yellin v. Toulaine Owners Corp.

Such a sign would not be placed if defendants did not believe the condition to be dangerous. Additionally,…

Webster v. City of New York

Plaintiffs do not refer the Court to any cases in which the absence of a conflicting expert report is,…