From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marbry v. Draughn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 1, 2021
3:20-cv-00352-LPR-JJV (E.D. Ark. Feb. 1, 2021)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00352-LPR-JJV

02-01-2021

COLTEN MARBRY ADC #172083 PLAINTIFF v. ALEX DRAUGHN, et al. DEFENDANTS


PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INSTRUCTIONS

The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. Your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

Mail your objections to:


Clerk, United States District Court

Eastern District of Arkansas

600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149

Little Rock, AR 72201-3325


DISPOSITION

Colten Marbry ("Plaintiff") filed a pro se Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 2). At the time Plaintiff filed this lawsuit, he was incarcerated in the Mississippi County Detention Center. (Id.) On December 28, 2020, mail from the Court to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable with the notation "Return To Sender No Longer At This Facility" on the envelope. (Doc. No. 19.) On December 29, 2020, I directed Plaintiff to update his address within thirty (30) days, as required by Local Rule 5.5 (Doc. No. 20.). (See also Doc. No. 5 at 3, advising Plaintiff of his duties under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).) Plaintiff was warned that if he did not do so, his case may be dismissed without prejudice. (Id.) Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court, and Mail from the Court to Plaintiff continues to be returned as undeliverable. (Doc. Nos. 21-23.)

IT IS, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED that:

1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) be DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this recommendation and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

DATED this 1st day of February 2021.

/s/_________

JOE J. VOLPE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Marbry v. Draughn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 1, 2021
3:20-cv-00352-LPR-JJV (E.D. Ark. Feb. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Marbry v. Draughn

Case Details

Full title:COLTEN MARBRY ADC #172083 PLAINTIFF v. ALEX DRAUGHN, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 1, 2021

Citations

3:20-cv-00352-LPR-JJV (E.D. Ark. Feb. 1, 2021)