From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. Jones County

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 9, 1998
231 Ga. App. 372 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy's conduct is precluded

Summary of this case from Moats v. Mendez

Opinion

A97A2452.

DECIDED MARCH 9, 1998 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED MARCH 20, 1998 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.

Wrongful death, etc. Bibb Superior Court. Before Judge Christian.

Buzzell, Graham Welsh, Neal B. Graham, Stephen M. Welsh, for appellant.

Groover Childs, Duke R. Groover, Frank H. Childs, Jr., for appellees.


Lillie Lowe, individually and as administratrix of the estate of her son, Leon Lowe, appeals from the grant of summary judgment to Jones County and Sheriff Reece in her wrongful death and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.

1. In reviewing grant or denial of summary judgment, this Court conducts a de novo review of the evidence. Goring v. Martinez, 224 Ga. App. 137, 138 (2) ( 479 S.E.2d 432) (1996); Gaskins v. Hand, 219 Ga. App. 823 ( 466 S.E.2d 688) (1996). Viewed under the standard of Lau's Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 ( 405 S.E.2d 474) (1991), the evidence was that around midnight on March 4, 1992, Jones County Sheriff's Deputy Darley was parked by the Gray Highway when a motorist pulled up and told him he had just passed a Thunderbird which he believed was being driven by a drunk driver because it was weaving and going under the speed limit. Gray Highway is a four lane highway with a dividing median. Darley saw the car coming toward him, pulled out behind it, and observed it "weave all over the road" while going about 30 mph, well under the speed limit. Darley activated his blue lights and pulled the car over, although Lowe, the driver, did not respond immediately.

Darley parked behind the Thunderbird with his blue lights on, investigated, and determined that Lowe had no driver's license and had been drinking. Darley asked Lowe to get out of the car and administered an alcosensor test which was positive. He advised Lowe he was under arrest and had him place his hands on top of the Thunderbird so he could do a pat down search. Lowe complied until Darley was patting down his ankles. Lowe then came off the car in an aggresive manner, slapped Darley in the face, said he was not going to jail, and ran across the highway.

Darley pursued Lowe on foot. Macon Officer Draper, who had witnessed the stop and the following altercation, blocked Lowe's route into surrounding woods with his car and joined in the foot pursuit. As the two officers had Lowe on the pavement in a traffic lane and were attempting to handcuff him, a car struck all three, killing Lowe and injuring Darley and Draper.

2. Lowe's complaint against Jones County is premised on vicarious liability for Darley's allegedly negligent actions in pursuing Lowe into traffic lanes. As found by the trial court, however, Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 S.E.2d 786) (1996) precludes such a claim because deputy sheriffs are employees of the sheriff, not the county, and the county cannot be held vicariously liable as their principal.

3. Lowe also alleged a state law claim against Jones County and Sheriff Reece in his official capacity for failure to properly train Darley in foot pursuit procedures, OCGA § 33-36-4, regarding which the trial court found Jones County and the sheriff entitled to official immunity.

"The operation of a police department, including the degree of training and supervision to be provided its officers, is a discretionary governmental function of the municipality as opposed to a ministerial, proprietary, or administratively routine function. [Cits.]" McDay v. City of Atlanta, 204 Ga. App. 621 (1) ( 420 S.E.2d 75) (1992). Liability may be imposed as a result of the exercise of such a discretionary function only when the acts complained of are done within the scope of the officer's authority and with wilfulness, malice or corruption. Id. There has been no showing of any conduct by Sheriff Reece or Jones County which would amount to wilfulness, malice or corruption. Both were entitled to official immunity as a matter of law. Woodard v. Laurens County, 265 Ga. 404, 405 (1) ( 456 S.E.2d 581) (1995); Gilbert v. Richardson, 264 Ga. 744, 752 (6) ( 452 S.E.2d 476) (1994); see Dyches v. McCorkle, 212 Ga. App. 209, 216 (2) ( 441 S.E.2d 518) (1994).

A showing of negligence, even gross negligence, will not suffice. Bontwell v. Dept. of Corrections, 226 Ga. App. 524, 528 (4) (a) ( 486 S.E.2d 917) (1997).

4. Finally, with regard to the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim, we find the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the county and Sheriff Reece.

While local governments may be liable for employing individuals who deprive citizens of their constitutional rights by acting under color of state law and, while inadequacy of police training may serve as a basis for § 1983 liability, such inadequacy must amount to "deliberate indifference to the . . . rights of persons with whom the police come into contact." City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 379 ( 109 S.C. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412) (1989). See Monell v. Dept. of Social Svcs c., 436 U.S. 658 ( 98 S.C. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611) (1978).

"`[F]or liability to attach in this circumstance the identified deficiency in a [county's] training program must be closely related to the ultimate injury. City of Canton, Ohio 489 U.S. [at 391]. `In virtually every instance where a person has had his or her constitutional rights violated by a [county] employee, a § 1983 plaintiff will be able to point to something the [county] "could have done" to prevent the unfortunate incident.' Id. at 392. Section 1983 claims will result only in liability against the [county] only when that [county's] failure to train reflects deliberate indifference to the rights of the inhabitants. Id." Watson v. Mayor c. of Savannah, 223 Ga. App. 399, 401-402 (1) ( 477 S.E.2d 667) (1996). See also Bell v. City of Albany, 210 Ga. App. 371, 373 ( 436 S.E.2d 87) (1993).

As thoroughly discussed by the trial court in her order, the facts here do not rise to this level. While Jones County does not have written policies specifically concerning foot pursuit, other regulations in the Sheriff's Department Policies Procedures Manual caution officers to "protect life and property" and that, "[w]hile the use of reasonable physical force may be necessary in situations which cannot be otherwise controlled, force may not be resorted to until all other reasonable alternatives have been exhausted or clearly [would] be ineffective under the particular circumstances. Officers are permitted to use whatever force is reasonable and necessary to protect others or themselves from bodily harm."

Jones County officers receive the state mandated training through the Regional Police Academy, as well as additional training provided by the sheriff and supervising officers during their recruit training, in service training, and advanced training. Twenty hours of training a year are required to keep their state certification. Even assuming some inadequacy in training, there certainly has been no showing of deliberate indifference. Bontwell, supra; see Anderson v. City of Glenwood, 893 F. Supp. 1086, 1089 (S.D. Ga. 1995) (persuasive authority).

Deputy Darley arrested Lowe for DUI and engaged in the foot pursuit after Lowe bolted because he believed Lowe was endangering himself as well as others by running across the four lane road.

Lowe's blood alcohol registered .30.

This incident was the only incident since Sheriff Reece had been sheriff in which a DUI suspect had been struck by a vehicle. Further, there was no pattern of incidents of other police misconduct during arrests of suspects.

Therefore, no evidence has been shown of any official county policy or custom of improperly engaging in foot pursuit which would endanger a citizen, nor was there evidence that the county or the sheriff endorsed an informal policy or custom of improperly arresting citizens. Jones County and Sheriff Reece were entitled to summary judgment on this basis. Watson, supra; Bell, supra; compare Mayor c. of Savannah v. Wilson, 214 Ga. App. 170, 171 (1) ( 447 S.E.2d 124) (1994).

Finally, because Lowe ran and the evidence does not show that the officers ever had Lowe handcuffed or fully under control, no causal nexus has been shown between any alleged lack of training and the death of Lowe. See Thompson v. Chapel, 229 Ga. App. 537, 538 (1) ( 494 S.E.2d 216) (1997).

Judgment affirmed. Pope, P.J., and Johnson, J., concur.


DECIDED MARCH 9, 1998 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED MARCH 20, 1998 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Lowe v. Jones County

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 9, 1998
231 Ga. App. 372 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)

holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy's conduct is precluded

Summary of this case from Moats v. Mendez

concluding "deputy sheriffs are employees of the sheriff, not the county, and the county cannot be held vicariously liable as their principal"

Summary of this case from Manders v. Lee

concluding "deputy sheriffs are employees of the sheriff, not the county, and the county cannot be held vicariously liable as their principal"

Summary of this case from Grech v. Clayton County

concluding "deputy sheriffs are employees of the sheriff, not the county, and the county cannot be held vicariously liable as their principal"

Summary of this case from Manders v. Lee

concluding “deputy sheriffs are employees of the sheriff, not the county, and the county cannot be held vicariously liable as their principal”

Summary of this case from Thornton v. Jackson

In Lowe v. Jones County, 231 Ga.App. 372, 499 S.E.2d 348, 350-51 (1998), the court reached the merits of a claim that a sheriff's training policies had violated the federal constitutional rights of the plaintiff's decedent.

Summary of this case from Manders v. Lee

noting that plaintiff brought action against county as well as sheriff in official capacity

Summary of this case from Grech v. Clayton County

noting that "because deputy sheriffs are employees of the sheriff, not the county, the county cannot be held vicariously liable as their principal"

Summary of this case from Guerra v. Rockdale Cnty.

explaining that "[t]he operation of a police department, including the degree of training and supervision to be provided its officers, is a discretionary governmental function," and, as such, a city may be liable based on the exercise of this function "only when the acts complained of are done within the scope of the officer's authority and with wilfulness, malice or corruption" (quoting McDay v. City of Atlanta, 420 S.E.2d 75, 75 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992))

Summary of this case from Merritt v. Gay
Case details for

Lowe v. Jones County

Case Details

Full title:LOWE v. JONES COUNTY et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 9, 1998

Citations

231 Ga. App. 372 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
499 S.E.2d 348

Citing Cases

Manders v. Lee

Importantly for the question here, Georgia courts have concluded that sheriffs, not counties, are…

Howard v. City of Columbus

Cantrell v. Thurman, supra at 514 (4). The dissent cites Lowe v. Jones County, 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 ( 499…