From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 12, 1982
671 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-3090.

March 12, 1982.

Before TANG, SKOPIL and CANBY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The panel determines that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. The Supreme Court has vacated and remanded our initial disposition of this case, Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 646 F.2d 1310 (9th Cir.), vacated, ___ U.S. ___, 102 S.Ct. 468, 70 L.Ed.2d 242 (1981), for reconsideration in light of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, Section 701, Pub.L. No. 97-34, 95 Stat. 172. Pursuant to this mandate, we vacate the district court judgment and remand the case to the district court for further consideration in light of the same statutory provision. Our order of May 4, 1981 is reinstated insofar as the appellees are entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs for trial and appellate proceedings up to that date in an amount to be determined by the district court on remand.

VACATED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 12, 1982
671 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1982)
Case details for

Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN B. LONG AND PHILIP H. LONG, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. BUREAU OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 12, 1982

Citations

671 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1982)

Citing Cases

Long v. U.S. I.R.S

In compliance with the Supreme Court's decision, this court remanded to the district court, but we expressly…

Long v. United States I.R.S

Upon passage of ERTA, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Long v. BEA and remanded the case to us for…