From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larkins v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 18, 2015
159 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation

Summary of this case from Eustache v. State

Opinion

No. 4D14–3366.

2015-03-18

Johnie Earl LARKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Glenn H. Mitchell , West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher , Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No.2008CF006119A.
Glenn H. Mitchell, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Johnie Earl Larkins appeals an order that summarily denied his multi-claim motion for postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm on all but one point and accept the State's concession that Larkins' sentence must be corrected to reflect his youthful offender status. Smith v. State, 143 So.3d 1023, 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); St. Cyr v. State, 106 So.3d 487, 489 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Knite v. State, 102 So.3d 691, 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Blacker v. State, 49 So.3d 785, 788 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), rev. denied,108 So.3d 656 (Fla.2012). As the cases point out, because of the substantive violation of probation, the trial court was not required to sentence Larkins to a youthful offender sentence of six years or less. However, it was required to continue that status upon resentencing after the violation of probation. Blacker, 49 So.3d at 788.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to correct the error and to amend Larkins' sentence to reflect his youthful offender classification as to his original charges. This ministerial sentence correction does not require Larkins' presence. See Jordan v. State, 143 So.3d 335, 339 (Fla.2014) (recognizing that defendant's presence is not required for a purely ministerial sentence correction).

Reversed and remanded.

STEVENSON, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Larkins v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 18, 2015
159 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

holding youthful offender status cannot be revoked even for committing a substantive probation violation

Summary of this case from Eustache v. State
Case details for

Larkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNIE EARL LARKINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

Citations

159 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Accordingly, we reverse and remand the denial of the appellant's fourth claim with directions for the trial…

Granger v. State

We write to note that this Court's opinions have consistently required a court to maintain a defendant's…