finding no conflict of interest where "no evidence that the lawyer representing [the witness at issue] on any active matter; nor is there any evidence he questioned [this witness] any less aggressively as a result of the alleged representation than he otherwise would have done."
Summary of this case from Stoudenmire v. Warden, Perry Corr. Inst.No. 90-333.
September 13, 1991.
ante, p. 350;
finding no conflict of interest where "no evidence that the lawyer representing [the witness at issue] on any active matter; nor is there any evidence he questioned [this witness] any less aggressively as a result of the alleged representation than he otherwise would have done."
Summary of this case from Stoudenmire v. Warden, Perry Corr. Inst.adopting rational and fair approach to alternative means analysis
Summary of this case from State v. Jonesgranting certiorari on the limited issue of the admissibility of victim impact evidence
Summary of this case from Payne v. StateIn Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 1277 (1991), the Court reasoned that in the absence of any constitutional right to counsel at post-conviction proceedings, there could also be no constitutional right to effective counsel at such proceedings.
Summary of this case from Berry v. StateFull title:LAMPF, PLEVA, LIPKIND, PRUPIS PETIGROW I v. GILBERTSON ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Sep 13, 1991
A. The Standard of Review for Habeas Corpus Petitions In reviewing a state prisoner's habeas corpus petition…
Swainson v. Varner"[I]f [a] petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies and the court to which petitioner would be required to…