Opinion
No. CV 09 403 61 89
July 8, 2009
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTIONS
This is a civil action wherein the plaintiff alleges that he and the three individual defendants had organized the corporate defendant as a non-profit Connecticut corporation on January 23, 2007. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was the President of the corporation from the time that it was organized, and that in January 2009 the three defendants purported to remove the plaintiff from his position of President, Director and Chief Operating Officer by filing an "amendment to the corporation" with the Secretary of State's office. The complaint seeks various restraining orders prohibiting the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff in the conduct of his office as President and preventing the defendants from engaging in certain corporate activities.
Before the court at this time is an application by the plaintiff seeking temporary injunctions in accordance with his prayers for relief. This court conducted an evidentiary hearing on June 4, 2009 with respect to the application for temporary restraining orders.
In order to grant temporary restraining orders the plaintiff must establish: 1. Irreparable and imminent injury; 2. Lack of an adequate remedy at law; 3. The likelihood of success on the merits; and 4. That a balancing of the equities favors granting the injunctions. Waterbury Teachers Ass'n. v. Freedom of Information Commission, 230 Conn. 441, 446 (1994).
The court finds that the plaintiff has failed to prove any of the aforesaid four elements which are required in order to obtain the temporary orders which he has requested.
The application for temporary restraining order is denied.