From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kobryn v. Kobryn

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 25, 1968
244 A.2d 411 (Conn. 1968)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1968

Decided June 25, 1968

Action for a divorce, brought to the Superior Court in Litchfield County, where the defendant filed a counterclaim and the issues were tried to the court, Meyers, J.; judgment for the defendant on the complaint and on the counterclaim, and appeal by the plaintiff. No error.

Julius Watstein, with whom was Herbert Watstein, for the appellant (plaintiff).

H. Gibson Guion, with whom, on the brief, was Hadley W. Austin, for the appellee (defendant).


The finding is not subject to correction in any respect which will assist the plaintiff. Any correction to which the plaintiff is entitled would not change the result in any way. Taylor v. Taylor, 154 Conn. 340, 341, 225 A.2d 196; Sipp v. Sipp, 151 Conn. 705, 197 A.2d 73. The assignment of error on the evidential ruling was not briefed and must therefore be considered abandoned. Bartlett v. Flaherty, 155 Conn. 203, 204, 230 A.2d 436; Shelton Yacht Cabana Club, Inc. v. Suto, 150 Conn. 251, 254, 188 A.2d 493; Hannifan v. Sachs, 150 Conn. 162, 165, 187 A.2d 253.

The conclusions which the court reached find ample support in the subordinate facts.


Summaries of

Kobryn v. Kobryn

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 25, 1968
244 A.2d 411 (Conn. 1968)
Case details for

Kobryn v. Kobryn

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KOBRYN v. GLADYS W. KOBRYN

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 25, 1968

Citations

244 A.2d 411 (Conn. 1968)
244 A.2d 411

Citing Cases

State v. Ghiloni

The defendant filed a motion to correct one paragraph of the finding which asserts that the defendant has…

Rex Marine Center, Inc. v. Newton

Whether motor vehicles tolerate abuse more than marine craft is irrelevant to this case. "The striking of the…