From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sipp v. Sipp

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 7, 1964
197 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1964)

Opinion

Argued November 6, 1963

Decided January 7, 1964

Action for a legal separation, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford and tried to the court, Devlin, J.; judgment for the plaintiff and appeal by the defendant. No error.

John J. Sullivan, for the appellant (defendant).

Morgan P. Ames, with whom was G. Campbell Becket, for the appellee (plaintiff).


The defendant has appealed from a judgment granting the plaintiff, his wife, a legal separation on the ground of intolerable cruelty and awarding her custody of and support for two of their three minor children and alimony. The defendant seeks to substitute 181 paragraphs of his oversized 305-paragraph draft finding for 52 of the 166 paragraphs of facts found by the court. In effect, he is attempting to retry the case on appeal. This practice has been repeatedly discouraged. Ball v. Branford, 142 Conn. 13, 15, 110 A.2d 459. The minor corrections to which he is entitled will not change the result. Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. Murray, 145 Conn. 427, 429, 143 A.2d 646.


Summaries of

Sipp v. Sipp

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 7, 1964
197 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1964)
Case details for

Sipp v. Sipp

Case Details

Full title:MILDRED M. SIPP v. ELMER F. SIPP, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 7, 1964

Citations

197 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1964)
151 Conn. 705

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Taylor

The finding is quite lengthy and detailed. The few corrections to which the plaintiff is entitled are of…

McLaughlin v. Chicken Delight, Inc.

In effect, the plaintiff is attempting to retry the case on appeal, a practice that has been repeatedly…