Summary
holding that withholding information is appropriate where release “could lead to possible witness intimidation”
Summary of this case from Tipograph v. Dep't of JusticeOpinion
No. 98-7023.
November 2, 1998.
Appeal from the D.C.D.C.
Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Kingston v. Washington Metro
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 2, 1998
172 F.3d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1998)
Summaries of
Kingston v. Washington Metro
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 2, 1998
172 F.3d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1998)
holding that withholding information is appropriate where release “could lead to possible witness intimidation”
Summary of this case from Tipograph v. Dep't of Justicerejecting argument that a court should apply a Rule 56 standard to a motion to amend, where discovery is not yet complete
Summary of this case from Uhlein v. SeymourCase details for
Kingston v. Washington Metro
Case Details
Full title:Kingston Contructors, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitian Area Transit…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Date published: Nov 2, 1998
Citations
172 F.3d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1998)
Citing Cases
Henderson v. Kennedy
Lawsuits challenging the regulation included one brought by seven non-profit organizations that had been…
Gruppo Formstar LLC v. FM Forrest, Inc. (In re FM Forrest, Inc.)and Prods. Liab. Litig. , 226 F.Supp.3d 557, 569–70 (D.S.C. 2017) ("While the specific language used by…