holding that "a plaintiff . . . cannot rely on attenuated possibilities that a jury would infer a discriminatory motive, but rather must come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and respond sufficiently to any rebuttal by the defendant to create a genuine issue of material fact"

Summary of this case from Grooms v. Wiregrass Electric Cooperative, Inc.

See 6 Summaries

Opinion

No. 83-5465.

December 12, 1983, OCTOBER TERM, 1983.

C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 712 F. 2d 1023.

Summaries of

Kincaid v. Eberle

U.S.

Dec 12, 1983

464 U.S. 1018 (1983)

Summary of this case from Grooms v. Wiregrass Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Summary of this case from Alford v. City of Montgomery, Alabama

holding that "a plaintiff" . . . cannot rely on attenuated possibilities that a jury would infer a discriminatory motive, but rather must come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and respond sufficiently to any rebuttal by the defendant to create a genuine issue of material fact

Summary of this case from Oliver v. Russell Corp.

holding that the notice of claim requirement in Education Law § 3813 applies when a plaintiff seeks "private relief, damages, or reinstatement for employment discrimination" in violation of the State or City Human Rights Law

Summary of this case from Hanna v. Klein

validating a stock lock-up under the business judgment rule

Summary of this case from Hanson Trust PLC v. ML SCM Acquisition Inc.

filing of a timely notice of claim is a condition precedent to a cause of action pursuant to Executive Law Section 296

Summary of this case from Pinder v. City of New York

Case details for