From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendrick v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 2, 1929
120 So. 144 (Ala. 1929)

Opinion

6 Div. 277.

February 2, 1929.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., and J. W. Brassell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

W. Emmett Perry, of Birmingham, opposed.

W. Marvin Woodall, David J. Davis, W. B. Harrison, A. Leo Oberdorfer, W. K. Terry, Jas. A. Simpson, Thos. J. Judge, T. A. Murphree, Matt H. Murphy, Fred Fite, and Horace C. Wilkinson, all of Birmingham, amici curiæ


William J. Kendrick was convicted of practicing law without license, and appealed to the Court of Appeals ( 120 So. 140), and the judgment being there affirmed, defendant (appellant) applied to the Supreme Court for writ of error to review said decision by the Court of Appeals. On said writ of error the judgment of the Court of Appeals being reversed (Kendrick v. State, 120 So. 142 ), said Court of Appeals entered judgment reversing the judgment of conviction, and the state now applies for certiorari to review and revise the said judgment and decision of the Court of Appeals in Kendrick v. State, 120 So. 140.

Ante, p. 277.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur, except BROWN and FOSTER, JJ., who dissent.


Summaries of

Kendrick v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 2, 1929
120 So. 144 (Ala. 1929)
Case details for

Kendrick v. State

Case Details

Full title:William J. KENDRICK v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 2, 1929

Citations

120 So. 144 (Ala. 1929)
120 So. 144