From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Juliana v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 10, 2021
986 F.3d 1295 (9th Cir. 2021)

Opinion

No. 18-36082

02-10-2021

Kelsey Cascadia Rose JULIANA; Xiuhtezcatl Tonatiuh M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez; Alexander Loznak; Jacob Lebel; Zealand B., through his Guardian Kimberly Pash-Bell; Avery M., through her Guardian Holly McRae; Sahara V., through her Guardian Toa Aguilar; Kiran Isaac Oommen; Tia Marie Hatton; Isaac V., through his Guardian Pamela Vergun; Miko V., through her Guardian Pamel Vergun; Hazel V., through her Guardian Margo Van Ummerson; Sophie K., through her Guardian Dr. James Hansen; Jaime B., through her Guardian Jamescita Peshlakai; Journey Z., through his Guardian Erika Schneider; Victoria B., through her Guardian Daisy Calderon; Nathaniel B., through his Guardian Sharon Baring; Aji P., through his Guardian Helaina Piper; Levi D., through his Guardian Leigh-Ann Draheim; Jayden F., through her Guardian Cherri Foytlin; Nicholas V., through his Guardian Marie Venner; Earth Guardians, a nonprofit organization; Future Generations, through their Guardian Dr. James Hansen, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America; Mary B. Neymayr, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality ; Mick Mulvaney, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and the Budget; Kelvin K. Droegemeir, Dr., in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy ; Dan Brouillette, Dr., in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy; U.S. Department of the Interior; David Bernhardt, in his official capacity as Secretary of Interior; U.S. Department of Transportation; Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of Transportation; United States Department of Agriculture; Sonny Perdue, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture; United States Department of Commerce; Wilbur Ross, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce; United States Department of Defense; Mark T. Esper, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; United States Department of State; Michael Pompeo, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the EPA; Office of the President of the United States; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Department of Energy; Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Defendants-Appellants.


ORDER

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 156, is DENIED .

Judges McKeown, Collins, Bress and VanDyke did not participate in the consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc.


Summaries of

Juliana v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 10, 2021
986 F.3d 1295 (9th Cir. 2021)
Case details for

Juliana v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA; XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 10, 2021

Citations

986 F.3d 1295 (9th Cir. 2021)

Citing Cases

In re Hawai‘i Elec. Light Co.

The plaintiffs’ request to the largest federal circuit in the United States for an en banc hearing was…