From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Judhani v. Holder

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 31, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1256-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1256-B.

March 31, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Irma Ramirez's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation (doc. 12) regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (doc. 8). The Magistrate Judge's report indicated that Plaintiffs failed to exhaust all administrative remedies before filing this action. Because Plaintiffs have another adequate remedy available to them, the Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). The Court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that all of the claims that were or could have been asserted in this civil action against Defendants in their official capacities are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Judhani v. Holder

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 31, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1256-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Judhani v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:FATEH ALI JUDHANI, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. ERIC HOLDER, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1256-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2011)

Citing Cases

Ramirez Garcia v. United States Citizenship

Per the “regulatory language” that applies to I-485 applicants, “the Fifth Circuit has repeatedly held that…