From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Holloway

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 24, 2021
Case No.: 2:20-cv-01005-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2021)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:20-cv-01005-APG-EJY

02-24-2021

BRANDIN LEE JOHNSON, Plaintiff v. QUANISHA HOLLOWAY, et al., Defendants


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case

[ECF No. 8]

On February 2, 2021, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice due to plaintiff Brandin Lee Johnson's failure to pay the filing fee or complete an in forma pauperis application. ECF No. 8. Johnson did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah's report and recommendation (ECF No. 8) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice.

I FURTHER ORDER the clerk of court to close this case.

DATED this 24th day of February, 2021.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Holloway

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 24, 2021
Case No.: 2:20-cv-01005-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. Holloway

Case Details

Full title:BRANDIN LEE JOHNSON, Plaintiff v. QUANISHA HOLLOWAY, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 24, 2021

Citations

Case No.: 2:20-cv-01005-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2021)