From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson Bronze Co. v. Ostapowicz

U.S.
Jan 10, 1977
429 U.S. 1041 (1977)

Summary

holding that where "defendant did not request a continuance or in any way claim that he was unable adequately to prepare to meet the rebuttal testimony [it] further militates against a finding that he was prejudiced by it."

Summary of this case from United States v. Parker

Opinion

No. 76-622.

January 10, 1977.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 541 F. 2d 394.


Summaries of

Johnson Bronze Co. v. Ostapowicz

U.S.
Jan 10, 1977
429 U.S. 1041 (1977)

holding that where "defendant did not request a continuance or in any way claim that he was unable adequately to prepare to meet the rebuttal testimony [it] further militates against a finding that he was prejudiced by it."

Summary of this case from United States v. Parker

holding that the prevention of a chilling effect on the First Amendment has little application where actual malice, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, has been shown

Summary of this case from Hinerman v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc.

upholding the exercise of personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state magazine publisher without mention of the first amendment

Summary of this case from Church of Scientology of California v. Adams

affirming without discussion the district court's calculation of back pay award which offset unemployment insurance in a Title VII case

Summary of this case from Equal Emp't Opportunity Com'n v. Sandia

affirming without discussion the district court's calculation of back pay award which had deducted unemployment insurance

Summary of this case from Kyriazi v. Western Electric Co.

arguing for a flexible approach

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Doe

arising from Ohio

Summary of this case from Yashon v. Gregory

espousing the belief that discrimination can be corrected "through administrative conciliation and persuasion"

Summary of this case from Bolden v. Ashcroft

noting that "[c]onciliation rather than formal court proceedings remains the preferred method of settling [discrimination] disputes"

Summary of this case from Lemke v. International Total Services, Inc.

noting that "[c]onciliation rather than formal court proceedings remains the preferred method of settling [discrimination] disputes"

Summary of this case from Lemke v. International Total Services, Inc.

discussing standard in Title VII action

Summary of this case from Shaver v. Corry Hiebert Corp.
Case details for

Johnson Bronze Co. v. Ostapowicz

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON BRONZE CO. v. OSTAPOWICZ

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 10, 1977

Citations

429 U.S. 1041 (1977)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

We granted certiorari, 444 U.S. 1042 (1980), to resolve a conflict among the Circuits on this important…

Intern. Longshoremen's Ass'n, v. N.L.R.B

Id. Because the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in No. 78-1510 (NY) believed that the case before him was…