From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jean-Pierre v. Naples Cmty. Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 14, 2020
Case No: 2:18-cv-98-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2020)

Opinion

Case No: 2:18-cv-98-FtM-38MRM

04-14-2020

WILNER JEAN-PIERRE, Plaintiff, v. NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink's availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. --------

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 65). Judge McCoy recommends granting Defendant Naples Community Hospital, Inc.'s Motion for Taxation of Costs and taking Plaintiff costs valued at $5,886.70. (Doc. 57). That sum includes $1,687.50 for Defendant's mediation costs, which Plaintiff Wilner Jean-Pierre objects to paying. (Doc. 66).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, and the court may accept, reject or modify the findings in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

The Supreme Court recently reiterated that, absent express authority from Congress, "courts may not award litigation expenses that are not specified in [28 U.S.C.] §§ 1821 and 1920." Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 873, 877 (2019). In deference to the Case Management and Scheduling Order ("CMSO"), which states that "[u]pon motion of the prevailing party, the party's share may be taxed as costs in this action," Judge McCoy recommends that Plaintiff pay Defendant's share of the mediation costs. But the Court finds that its CMSO must give way to the Supreme Court's clear directive. So the Court will not award Defendant its mediation costs.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 65) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in part.

1. Naples Community Hospital, Inc.'s Motion for Taxation of Costs (Doc. 57) is GRANTED to the extent outlined above. Naples Community Hospital, Inc. is awarded $4,199.20 in costs.

2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to amend the judgment to include a cost award in favor of Naples Community Hospital, Inc.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 14th day of April 2020.

/s/ _________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Jean-Pierre v. Naples Cmty. Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 14, 2020
Case No: 2:18-cv-98-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Jean-Pierre v. Naples Cmty. Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:WILNER JEAN-PIERRE, Plaintiff, v. NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 14, 2020

Citations

Case No: 2:18-cv-98-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2020)

Citing Cases

Thorkelson v. Marceno

Relying on Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc., this Court has found that notwithstanding any language in…