From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Targa Channelview, LLC

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Sep 8, 2020
NO. 14-20-00590-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2020)

Summary

dismissing original proceeding for lack of subject-matter without citing Rule 42.3, without granting a motion to dismiss, and without giving ten days’ notice

Summary of this case from In re Kholaif

Opinion

NO. 14-20-00590-CV

09-08-2020

IN RE TARGA CHANNELVIEW, LLC, Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
80th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2018-90859

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 26, 2020, relator Targa Channelview, LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Larry Weiman, presiding judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his August 21, 2020 order overruling Targa's objection to trial by videoconference and denying relator's opposed motion for continuance of the trial.

Relator's requests for relief are not ripe for our review. See Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale, 964 S.W.2d 922, 924 (Tex. 1998) ("Ripeness is an element of subject matter jurisdiction.") Accordingly, we dismiss relator's petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.


Summaries of

In re Targa Channelview, LLC

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Sep 8, 2020
NO. 14-20-00590-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2020)

dismissing original proceeding for lack of subject-matter without citing Rule 42.3, without granting a motion to dismiss, and without giving ten days’ notice

Summary of this case from In re Kholaif
Case details for

In re Targa Channelview, LLC

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TARGA CHANNELVIEW, LLC, Relator

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 8, 2020

Citations

NO. 14-20-00590-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2020)

Citing Cases

In re Kholaif

The majority does not cite any cases in which this court dismissed an original-proceeding petition for lack…